Pill and Greene voting for a hike makes the hold more hawkish than the headline decision.
-10 strong dovish to +10 strong hawkish.
MPC voted 7-2 to maintain Bank Rate.
Two members preferred an immediate 25 bp hike to 4%.
Labour market loosening and lower inflation path argue for patience.
Readout
Score Formula
Hold/cut/hike and whether expected.
Dissents toward hike or cut.
Energy shock, second-round effects, expectations.
Slack, GDP, wages, vacancies.
Near-term CPI path versus prior report.
Ready to act, look-through language.
Bailey/interviews/minutes nuance.
Score History
| Current score | Score updated | Previous score | Previous score updated |
|---|---|---|---|
| +2.6 | 18 Jun 2026 | +2.5 | 30 Apr 2026 MPR setup |
Score updated is the MPC decision package used for the current score. Previous score updated is the immediately prior scored BoE event.
Bias Score Time Series
Meeting Scorecard
| Event | Action | Vote / signal | Action | Vote | Inflation | Demand | Forecast | Guide | Total | Label |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-conflict path | Expected easing path | Rate cuts had been expected before the energy shock. | -0.6 | 0.0 | -0.2 | -0.3 | -0.3 | 0.0 | -1.9 | Slight dovish |
| April MPR setup | Hold / scenarios | Energy scenarios raised the bar for cuts. | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.1 | -0.4 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 2.5 | Hawkish lean |
| 18 Jun 2026 MPC | Hold at 3.75% | 7-2 hold; two hike dissents. | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.2 | -0.8 | -0.3 | 1.0 | 2.6 | Mild hawkish hold |
Language Audit
The MPC said policy must lean against price/wage-setting effects if energy shock persistence becomes embedded.
The Bank preserved optionality to tighten if inflation is not on track to return to 2%.
Inflation was expected to be a little under 3% in Q3 and a little over 3.25% in Q4, below April expectations.
Weak demand, falling vacancies and subdued growth restrain pass-through.
Market participants expected Bank Rate to stay unchanged at this meeting and broadly over the year ahead.
Versus Expectations
| Area | Before the decision | Outcome | Surprise | Bias read |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rate decision | Hold widely expected. | Held at 3.75%. | 0.0 | Neutral. |
| Vote split | At least one hike vote expected; more dissents possible. | Two hike votes. | +0.5 | Hawkish lean. |
| Inflation forecast | Conflict risk kept inflation anxiety high. | Forecast lowered versus April. | -0.5 | Dovish offset. |
| Market reaction | Hawkish tone possible. | Sterling weakened; markets focused on lower inflation and slack. | -0.2 | Mixed. |
Reusable BoE Checklist
BoE votes reveal more than the headline decision.
Oil/gas levels, cap pass-through and futures curves matter.
Wages, expectations and firm price-setting are the key phrases.
Vacancies, wage growth, GDP and PMIs can offset inflation pressure.
Separate expected path from market risk premia.
Look for ?romptly?? ?ook through?? and ?eady to act??
Sources Checked
| Source | Used for | Link |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of England June 2026 Summary and Minutes | Bank Rate, 7-2 vote, inflation/labour/guidance language. | Official BoE minutes |
| Governor broadcast interview | Bailey tone after the decision. | BoE related link |
| Guardian / WSJ / FT reporting | Expectation baseline, market reaction, dissent interpretation. | Guardian recap |
Checked 18 June 2026. Analytical framework, not investment advice.